|
|
Greetings to everyone this Fall season. The Oregon Chapter of the LDA wishes
to welcome you to our Fall 2006 Newsletter. We hope you will find these articles
informative and useful. Please feel free to contact us for further information
and assistance. Remember to visit our website @ www.ldaor.org for links to other
resources.
|
|
|
|
|
The Turned Off Child by Myrna
Gordon |
|
THE TURNED OFF CHILD By Myrna Gordon Why are so many of our children failing
to work up to their abilities in school? What turns students off to learning at
school and at home? What is the difference between a motivated learner and a
turned-off child? Are you looking for answers as to why your child id depressed,
has low self-esteem, and fights doing his work both at home and at school? Is
your child afraid to try new things for fear of failing? Does he disappear into
a world of video/computer games or other activities where there is success? Has
your child developed self-defeating strategies and thinks he is too stupid to
learn? After many years of working with these turned-off children, both as
teachers and educational therapists, and after looking into thirty years of
research on the subject, the consensus of opinion is that these children have
what is called “learned helplessness”. Learned helplessness is a learned
behavior – a conditioned response. It is not a conscious decision not to learn.
These children have cognitive, motivational and emotional deficits because they
have experienced so much failure, or what they think of as failure, in their
young lives that they don’t try. It hurts too much to try. They have turned off
because, in their minds, that is the safest way to avoid failing. Their
explanation for failure is, “I’m dumb” or “I can’t do anything right”. They feel
they have no control over the learning situation so they either run away from
learning or they become rebellious and fight with everyone who tries to help
them. What causes children to become learned-helpless and to develop this
negative way of explaining failures and setbacks? Why do they become helpless,
depressed, stressed and anxious? To find answers to these questions, we must
understand how children view their successes and failures in life. It is not
possible to cure learned helplessness by just saying positive thing to children.
We need to get them to think about their thinking and to tell us what their
negative thoughts are. Once we know that negative things children are saying to
themselves, we can try to refute them and change their thinking, their
self-talk. There are three probable ways children develop a positive or negative
way of explaining life’s events. Home and school have the greatest influence on
the child. All adults involved with children can either help or hurt their
development, whether intended and desired or not. The primary source for a
child’s explanatory style is the mother (or the significant other (in the
child’s life. The child forms impressions form what she sees and hears that are
the solid foundations for future pessimism and optimism. The secondary source is
other adults, particularly those in school. When a child brings home reports and
assessments of her schoolwork, she gets a combined reaction of both home and
school: in other words, a double whammy. This applies both to positive and
negative criticism. A child believes what he hears, and everything has either a
positive or negative effect on them. This should make us realize how potent our
explanatory comments are. There is not neutral reaction. The third influence on
a child’s explanatory style is life crises. Some negative life events include
moving, death, divorce and unresolved fighting. The time to look at a child’s
explanatory style is in grade school and junior high, before lifelong habits and
defenses become cast in cement. Remediation of learned helplessness is like a
three-legged stool. The first leg id developing an adequate understanding of
what learned helplessness is and what causes it. This cannot be stressed enough,
for without a thorough understanding of the problem and its depth, not only can
the problem not be remediated, but the child may be insulated against future
help. The second leg is helping children discover the root beliefs that cause
their self-defeating strategies and the distorted perceptions these beliefs
create. If you don’t eliminate the negative thinking first, it will be like
trying to put a Band-aid on the measles. To do this we teach children to be
“thought detectives”, to think about their thinking. It has to be the child’s
thoughts, not ours. We like to have the child tell us about an event, her
beliefs about what occurred, and what resulted because of these beliefs.
Sometimes we start with events in our own lives and model these for the child.
It is also sometimes good to start with happy events before getting into
negative events. We have children do this over and over again until they become
very good “thought detectives”. The third leg of the stool is giving children
the tools to change and refute the distorted beliefs and thereby reduce the
emotional, motivational, and learning deficits they create. Once children have
become good at looking at their thinking, they are ready to start disputing this
thinking. We want them to argue with themselves like an attorney and to change
the things they are saying from negative to positive. We model by doing this
ourselves with negative things that happen in our own lives. We try to help the
child by suggesting alternate ways of looking at a situation. However, in the
end the child must internalize and believe that suggestions for them to become a
part of his own self-talk and be effective. Throughout everything, we do with
the learned-helpless child, we must establish and maintain a warm trusting
relationship. If the child is feeling fear it is impossible for him to relate
and think about his thinking. It is necessary that the adult working with the
child have a positive attitude. There should be not emphasis on errors, only
what is right about the work. Children need to know how to handle mistakes in a
positive manner, and as adults we can model this behavior for them. The work
need not be perfect by our standards, but it needs to be acceptable by theirs.
Every child has something that he does well; use this as a means to work
through. Have the child teach you how to do something, letting him role-play
being the teacher. There should be no time pressures. We like to reward positive
behaviors along the way. This is not a bribe but a way of conditioning their
responses to something pleasurable rather than punishing. One method of
remediation we have found to be very effective is giving children a different
rationale for their failures. We relate their brain to a light switch. When the
light switch is off we cannot see well. The same is true of our brain, for we
cannot think well if it is turned off. To get light we must turn on the switch,
and to start the child thinking we must turn on the switch in them. Sometimes we
ask the child to put on our adult shoes and to try to run. When the child finds
it difficult or impossible, we ask, “Does that mean you can never run again?”
The child will answer, “If just means the shoes are too big.” Children sometimes
have physical problems, such as visual or hearing, which make learning
difficult. They learn that these are not excuses but differences and they learn
to accept them and then to compensate for them. The same is true of emotional
and family problems. Children need to understand and to get help in coping with
these problems. We know we have just briefly touched on some of the aspects of
remediating learned helplessness in children and eliminating school failure. We
have written a book titled The Turned-Off Child: Learned Helplessness and School
Failure, published by American Book Publishing. This is available through
Publisher Direct Bookstore at www.pdbookstore.com. We can change the child’s
whole life by turning the child on to learning. Myrna Gordon is from Beaumont CA
and is a member ODA of California. If you would like to contact her, you can
email her at gordonrm@adelphia.net, or go to the website:
www.turned-offchild.com. Source: National PTA (www.pta.org)
|
|
Read
on...www.turned-offchild.com |
|
|
LDA National-
Pittsburgh 4 Day - Busy Conference |
|
Here’s a peek at four of the sessions during the 2007 LDA Conference,
February 14-17 in Pittsburgh On Wednesday afternoon the Keynote Address will be
made by Dr. Naomi Zigmond of the University of Pittsburgh, who is widely known
for her practical research on the effectiveness of services for students with
learning disabilities. The title of her speech, “The Special Education Teacher
in the Twenty-First Century: A Call for Unconventional Thinking,” reflects her
view that the pressures of high-stakes accountability assessments not only puts
pressure on students, families, and teachers, but calls for a re-examination of
the qualifications, roles, and responsibilities of the special education teacher
who words with students with learning disabilities. What changes in special
education will Dr. Zigmond suggest and why? Dr. Herbert Needleman, who will
address a General Session of the Conference on Thursday morning, is an
internationally known researcher and expert on the effects of exposure to lead
in common products such as paints and gasoline. His studies and his persistent
advocacy to reduce lead hazards have drawn national and international attention
to the dangers of lead in the environment and that resulted in a five-fold
reduction of lead poisoning in American children. In research with children and
adults at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, he has shown that lead
exposure can have developmental implications. It increases the risk of reading
disabilities, high school drop-out rates, juvenile delinquency, and adult
criminal behavior, even when there are no outward signs of lead poisoning. How
can Dr. Needleman’s research findings and successful advocacy help LDA move
forward as advocates for those with learning disabilities? In the Friday morning
General Session, Dr. Perry Zirkel, will bring his legal expertise to the LDA
Conference. A Professor at Lehigh University, Dr. Zirkel has published more than
1,000 papers and writes a regular column in Phi Delta Kappa on special education
law. His most recent book is the The Legal Meaning of Specific Learning
Disability for Special Education Eligibility. With the passage of IDEA 04,
policy letters and the expected upcoming release of the regulations, states and
districts will be deciding what role discrepancy and a process that determines
response to scientific, research-based intervention will play in Specific
Learning Disabilities (SLD) identification. There will also be changes in
teacher training, instructional materials, and general/special education
collaboration. What does existing case law suggest about SLD identification and
classification and how might they relate to Section 504 and American
Disabilities Act? The Friday evening Awards Banquet will feature Mr. Kevin
McClatchy, Chief Executive Officer and part owner of the Pittsburgh Pirates
baseball team. Mr. McClatchy, who struggled with reading and learning
disabilities, has become a highly successful newspaper publisher with more than
30 daily newspapers that reach more than 3 million readers. He will not only
share his experiences with dyslexia, but also give us an informal perspective
about his road to success in spite of barriers that, at times, seemed
overwhelming. How can sharing in Kevin McClatchy’s success story help LDA foster
greater success in individuals of all ages with learning disabilities? Please
look for you conference brochure in the mail or call the national office at
412-341-1515 for more information. |
|
Read on...www.ldaamerica.org |
| |